1. 立论依据：420分
2. 研究方案：330分
3. 研究基础：250分
总分1000分
一、立论依据 （420分）
1. 课题研究的意义（100分)
涉及重要领域的重要问题, 具有重要的理论价值或应用前景
2. 科学性：（90分）
研究的背景：国内外目前的研究现状n
存在的问题：提出研究的切入点n
研究设想：研究目标及思路n
3. 学术思想及创新性（150分）
理论创新：新学说或理论n
方法创新：新方法n
技术创新：技术改进或完善n
4. 对国内外研究现状的了解（80分)
广度和深度：近5年的主要研究进展n
研究中存在的主要问题
参考文献： 国外文献 近5年n 数量：20-30
二、研究方案
（330分）
1. 研究内容和拟解决的关键问题（80分）
范围合适：3-5个内容n
重点突出：1-2个重点n
关键问题选择准确：1-2个关键问题n
2. 技术路线（90分）
设计合理：基础与临床n
方法可行：成熟可靠 可重复性强 易于掌握n
3. 研究方法及手段（90分）
方法先进：n
技术成熟可靠：n
有创新：n
4. 研究的预期目标（70分）：
明确，可以达到，留有余地。
发表的研究论文：n
申请的技术专利：n
可应用产品的开发：n
三、研究基础
（250分）
1. 与本项目有关的工作积累（90分）
主要研究者的研究背景及经验：n
与本研究相关的前期研究：n
n 已发表的研究论文：
2. 已具备的实验条件（80分）
实验室条件：主要仪器和设备n
n 技术条件：实验模型的建立,预实验的结果,关键实验材料
国内及国际合作：合作的背景及技术优势n
3. 项目组成员（80分）
主要成员6-10名，结构合理
高级研究人员（1-2人）n
中级研究人员（2-3人）n
n 技术人员及研究生（3-5人）
四、经费预算
人员费：5 %n
管理费：5 %n
仪器费：《 10%n
n 合作费：《 10％
实验材料费：60-70%n
五、专家委员会的意见
要对申请人及研究项目进行具体的评价：
n 学术水平：已经取得的成就
科学态度：人品及学风n
项目的重要性：理论意义及实用价值n
n 实验条件：能否满足研究需要
六、如何提高中标率
1. 精选课题申请人：
2. 预审标书并进行修改：
3. 优化组合研究队伍：
4. 孵化、扶植课题项目：

谈谈人员梯队:
项目组成员（80分）
主要成员6-10名，结构合理
高级研究人员（1-2人）
中级研究人员（2-3人）
技术人员及研究生（3-5人）


一份标书的重点

摘要及立项依据，
1、摘要限400字，因此要特别注意重点突出，防止“头重脚轻”，即与课题相关的一般性描述太多，而对要研究的东西阐述不够。
2、观点(推论)一定要明确，非常肯定。
3、立项依据中研究意义要争取开门见山，不要说过多相关但无直接联系的话，主要是讲清楚你发现了什么，准备做什么，怎么去做。国内外研究现状不必太多，但除了有最新的权威杂志文章以外，最好加入部分国内相关领域专家的新文章，不必故意回避，而且如果恰好碰上这份专家评审，那就更好了。
4、最好包括已有工作基础一节，将已有相关结果以及发表的杂志列上，可以增加可信度。
二、研究内容及方案切忌复杂，以免过于凌乱，步骤最好有一流程图。其实我请教过多位评审专家，一份标书最多看半个小时。
三、可行性分析可包括：理论上可行、有预实验基础、课题组成员力量雄厚、技术成熟、实验设备有保障这几部分。

3点不中的可能

供大家参考：1.研究基础确实不够；（对策：猛干一年，发表几篇高水平文章）2.有好的基础和思路，但标书在表述方面没写好；（看人家怎么写，斑竹已经讲得很清楚了）3.人情关系没走通，（呵呵，拿着手榴弹到处去炸吧）。

The key trick is to plan your argument in six sentences, and then use these to structure the entire thesis/paper/essay. The six sentences are:

1. Introduction. In one sentence, what’s the topic? Phrase it in a way that your reader will understand. If you’re writing a PhD thesis, your readers are the examiners – assume they are familiar with the general field of research, so you need to tell them specifically what topic your thesis addresses. Same advice works for scientific papers – the readers are the peer reviewers, and eventually others in your field interested in your research, so again they know the background work, but want to know specifically what topic your paper covers.
2. State the problem you tackle. What’s the key research question? Again, in one sentence. (Note: For a more general essay, I’d adjust this slightly to state the central question that you want to address) Remember, your first sentence introduced the overall topic, so now you can build on that, and focus on one key question within that topic. If you can’t summarize your thesis/paper/essay in one key question, then you don’t yet understand what you’re trying to write about. Keep working at this step until you have a single, concise (and understandable) question.
3. Summarize (in one sentence) why nobody else has adequately answered the research question yet. For a PhD thesis, you’ll have an entire chapter, covering what’s been done previously in the literature. Here you have to boil that down to one sentence. But remember, the trick is not to try and cover all the various ways in which people have tried and failed; the trick is to explain that there’s this one particular approach that nobody else tried yet (hint: it’s the thing that your research does). But here you’re phrasing it in such a way that it’s clear it’s a gap in the literature. So use a phrase such as “previous work has failed to address…”. (if you’re writing a more general essay, you still need to summarize the source material you’re drawing on, so you can pull the same trick – explain in a few words what the general message in the source material is, but expressed in terms of what’s missing)
4. Explain, in one sentence, how you tackled the research question. What’s your big new idea? (Again for a more general essay, you might want to adapt this slightly: what’s the new perspective you have adopted? or: What’s your overall view on the question you introduced in step 2?)
5. In one sentence, how did you go about doing the research that follows from your big idea. Did you run experiments? Build a piece of software? Carry out case studies? This is likely to be the longest sentence, especially if it’s a PhD thesis – after all you’re probably covering several years worth of research. But don’t overdo it – we’re still looking for a sentence that you could read aloud without having to stop for breath. Remember, the word ‘abstract’ means a summary of the main ideas with most of the detail left out. So feel free to omit detail! (For those of you who got this far and are still insisting on writing an essay rather than signing up for a PhD, this sentence is really an elaboration of sentence 4 – explore the consequences of your new perspective).
6. As a single sentence, what’s the key impact of your research? Here we’re not looking for the outcome of an experiment. We’re looking for a summary of the implications. What’s it all mean? Why should other people care? What can they do with your research. (Essay folks: all the same questions apply: what conclusions did you draw, and why would anyone care about them?)

The abstract I started with summarizes my approach to abstract writing as an abstract. But I suspect I might have been trying to be to clever. So here’s a simpler one:

(1) In widgetology, it’s long been understood that you have to glomp the widgets before you can squiffle them. (2) But there is still no know general method to determine when they’ve been sufficiently glomped. (3) The literature describes several specialist techniques that measure how wizzled or how whomped the widgets have become during glomping, but all of these involve slowing down the glomping, and thus risking a fracturing of the widgets. (4) In this thesis, we introduce a new glomping technique, which we call googa-glomping, that allows direct measurement of whifflization, a superior metric for assessing squiffle-readiness. (5) We describe a series of experiments on each of the five major types of widget, and show that in each case, googa-glomping runs faster than competing techniques, and produces glomped widgets that are perfect for squiffling. (6) We expect this new approach to dramatically reduce the cost of squiffled widgets without any loss of quality, and hence make mass production viable.